Yaua Son of Omri Yet Again
The Biblical/Israelite Origin of the White Race
The knowledge of your identity should inspire and invigorate you with evangelical fervor, to make a positive deviation in your globe and to serve God more faithfully each day. The Anglo-Israel identity is now a proven fact! What y'all practice with this knowledge is upward to you lot. See to it that you lot make your calling and election sure! (2 Peter i:x).
by Rachel Pendergraft
A few more stupid comments have come to my attention regarding the origin and colonization of the white race. I know most didn't learn this in school and its hard to find a lot of books about it today, although there are quite a few. Yous can't write a volume nigh something that you have no noesis well-nigh and it certainly therefore follows that you aren't going to learn almost information technology in the majority of educational institutions including Bible seminary. I know that yous just don't know, merely its distressing when you lot don't know that you don't know. The Bible says that truth is given to those who love truth. If you don't have a real love for truth -- even if you call back y'all may not like that truth -- then you aren't going to have it. Sorry. One of the silliest comments was a statement proverb that the Greeks, Italians, and Spanish aren't white! Can y'all believe it! I know that nosotros will observe some Greeks, Spaniards, Portuguese, and Italians that aren't white. But you will too notice some folks from Nebraska, Kansas, and Ireland that aren't white. Heck, we even just finished jubilant Columbus Day and we heard plenty of troublemakers ranting about how we shouldn't be celebrating the white racist colonization of America. Gee, folks are confused. And I know it can get difficult to empathise given the educational standards of the last threescore years in this and other nations, only Hispanic is not a racial determination. Hispanic is a language identifier. Just considering there was widespread race mixing throughout Mexico, Key and South America and those people speak Castilian doesn't mean that Spaniards are not white. The bulk of the people of Kingdom of spain remain white and there are nonetheless white people in S America. Believe me, the white nationalists in countries like Argentina and Brazil can tell all of the states in the U.Due south., Canada, and our other white sister nations what the consequences of race mixing are. Yup, they sure are living the dream downward there. Are yous ready for a majority non-white U.Due south.? Well, get set for it. Like Brad Paisley says, "Welcome to the future!" So for those of you who don't let MTV, CNN and even FOX news practise your thinking for you, beneath is a niggling bit of info, amid a vast array of other historical information available, that I have selected to share with you lot. It might be difficult for some of you to read, depending on your educational level, but I know plenty of you will write and thank me and of course I say, "you're welcome!" A highly respected Danish linguistic expert Dr. Ann Kristensen has reached the same conclusion (that nosotros have proclaimed for years) that the Cimmerians who later became the Celts can exist positively identified as a section of the so-called "Lost Ten Tribes of Israel" in displacement. Dr Kristensen was skeptical at first but the more she researched into Assyrian sources she establish the Cimmerians making their first appearance in recorded history around 714 B.C. in the very area of modernistic Iran where the Assyrians had settled the deported tribes of Israel a few years earlier. She reaches conclusions that the Gimira or Cimmerians are lost Israelites. In Who Were the Cimmerians and Where Did They Come From? -- translated by Jorgen Laessoe of the Purple Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, Dr Kristensen wrote:
"There is scarcely reason whatever longer to doubt the exciting and verily astonishing assertion propounded by students of the 10 Tribes, that the Israelites deported from Scrap Humria of the House of Omri are identical with the Gimirraja of the Assyrian sources. Everything indicates that the Israelite deportees did not vanish from the picture but that, abroad, under new conditions they connected to leave their mark on History."
The following report presents exciting new research identifying the descendants of the ancient lost business firm of Israel. It has tremendous begetting on Bible prophecy, the fulfillment of the covenants, and the duties and obligations of God'south called people in the globe today.
I. Links to Aboriginal Israel
What happened to the Biblical house of Israel, the people of God who were carried away into Assyrian captivity eight centuries before Christ and never heard from again? This historic period-old mystery can finally be solved through the knowledge which archeology provides concerning ancient languages. The evidence post-obit supports the theory that the ancient x tribes of the northern kingdom of State of israel, after their conquest by Assyria in the belatedly eighth century, B.C., became the Scythian-Cimmerian-Celtic peoples who colonized Europe in the early on Christian centuries. This has been analyzed in an interesting commodity past author and historian Geoffrey Ashe. [1] Nosotros volition address this through linguistics, the study of languages. Names of tribal units modify when carried over into other languages, making it a claiming to connect them without definite guidelines to determining linguistic communication affinities. There are two well-established principles in particular that enter into this discussion regarding ancient languages, both European and Middle-Eastern. Ane concerns consonants, and the other concerns vowels. They are: � "Guttural" consonants "Kh", hard "G", and hard "C" are interchangeable. Consonants
� Vowels are very frequently interchanged, added, or substituted.
We will examine what recognized language scholars take written concerning these principles, then brand a practical application of them. First, concerning consonants, the learned seventeenth-century linguistic scholar, Dr. O'Brien, compiler of the first Irish-Keltic language dictionary, had this to say:
"It hath been observed in the remarks on the letter C, that it is naturally commutable with G, both messages being of the aforementioned organ and nearly of the aforementioned ability; and hence, in our old parchments, they are written indifferently for each other....The aforementioned indifference, or interchangeable utilise of messages G and C in the Latin tongue, and the latter being by and large substituted in the place of the former, appears from ancient Roman inscriptions, and most particularly from that of the Columna Rostrata, erected in award of Duillins, the Consul, whereupon were engraved the words macistratos, leciones, pucnando, Carthaciniensis, for magistratos, legiones, pugnando, Carthaginiensis, etc...Which gave occasion to Diomedes to phone call Grand a new consonant." [2]
This interchangeability of difficult consonants was also truthful in ancient Mesopotamia. In the Assyrian Cuneiform Alphabet, the same grapheme stands for both the hard "M" and "Kh," (as can be seen in the encyclopedia chart reproduced in the written course of this tract). [3] A moments' reflection will indicate to you that the aforementioned part of the mouth and throat is used to sound out all three hard consonants: Kh, hard Thousand, and hard C, and that a change of spelling is easily and logically made from 1 to another, because virtually no change in pronunciation is involved. This is verified by modern Hebrew language and literature scholar, Dr. Isaac Elchanan Mozeson, who teaches language studies at Yeshiva University in Jerusalem. He states, "The Hebrew M, the Gimel, is often a Grand in Greek and other Western tongues. [The Hebrew letter of the alphabet G] resembles a backwards K." [4] As an case, Mozeson gives the word, "colossus," which originated as "Golios" -- the Hebrew word for the Biblical giant, Goliath. He states, "The Greek pronunciation would sound like "kol-ios" -- just as the [Hebrew word for camel], Gamal, was rendered "kamelos." [5] Annotation again the interchanges between the K, Chiliad, and C. Another key bespeak is that information technology is the consonants which deport the value. Language expert, Siegfried H. Muller says, "In well-nigh languages, consonants are the primary carriers of idea." Further,
"The outstanding structural feature of the Hamito-Semitic family is triliterality of word roots. They consist by and large of three consonants, and the insertion or omission of vowels -- often not written and to be supplied by the reader...vocalization of consonants serves to create a prepare of verb and noun forms whose meanings are related to that of the root."
In other words, from a word root of three consonants, various related words would be created by insertion of vowels, but all of them would carry the aforementioned bones significant as the root. You would not exist able to take a root discussion applied to a particular tribe of people, add differing vowels and identify a different tribe. If the consonantal root give-and-take is the same, the ii tribes would be the same people. For example, Muller says, "Correspondingly, from Hebrew KTV are derived KoTaV, "written," KTiVah, "writing," KTiV, "spelling," KToVet, "inscription," KTaV, "script," KaTaV, "correspondent." In all of these, although various vowels be added, the words all correspond to the same root topic. We volition exist applying this interesting principle shortly in connecting several seemingly unrelated aboriginal tribes. Vowels Nineteenth-century scholar, Sir William Betham (1779-1853), was knighted by the Rex of England for his enquiry into ancient history, linguistic communication, and archeology. He had this to say concerning vowels in ancient languages: "Vowels are often substituted for each other: the same words are written promiscuously with an a, o, and u, an due east or an i." [6] As an example, he discussed the ancient inhabitants of western Uk, "the Welsh, who have e'er chosen themselves by the proper name of Cymri, Cimbri, or Cumbri." [seven] As can be easily seen, the name of this ancient tribe has been variously spelled with differing vowels: Y (often chosen a "pseudo-vowel"), I, and U. Such variations are a good case of the common vowel shifts which are constitute in the name of this historic people, who we will learn more of shortly. Another scholar of renown was Dr. Richard Cumberland (1632-1718), Anglican Bishop of England in the early 17th century. He authored several historic books, and was well-regarded in his twenty-four hours for his expertise in ancient history and languages. He wrote, "The learned will non wonder at change of vowels in a name, especially when its made past authors of different countries and times, because they know this is a thing very usual; all the same for the service of readers that are not much used to such changes, I will give proof thereof."
"Wherefore, I accept observed, that in Jeremiah 48:23, our translation calls a place in Moab, Beth Meon, which signifies the firm or temple of Meon, agreeably to the Hebrew text and to the Chaldee paraphrase. But the Septuagint calls it the house of Maon; and then doth the vulgar Latin. The Moabites agreed with the Egyptians in their idolatry, who worshipped their beginning male monarch and planter as a god, under the proper noun of Osiris. Only when they speak of him equally a human who kickoff reigned amongst them, they telephone call him Meon or Menes, with a Greek termination: Which give-and-take, Bochart well observes, signifies habitations or places to dwell in, which he brought them to and settled them in."
Samuel Bochart (1599-1667) was a well-known Huguenot scholar. "Now, past the same reason that Meon is changed into Maon, Menes must get Manes, as he is called in Herodotus and Dionysius Halicarnassensis, or Manis, equally this god and powerful potentate is called by Plutarch de Iside." [eight] On the subject area of vowels, Professor Cyrus H. Gordon, who is peradventure the leading American archeologist of the twentieth century, stated concerning a Hebrew Old Testament name, "The ancient Hebrew text...has simply the consonants...which were later supplied with vowels to make a verbal noun of information technology." [10] In the sixth century, A.D., Hebrew scholars added vowel marks to the text of the Hebrew Bible in an attempt to restore the original pronunciation of words. Merely in some cases, with words not commonly used, they had to guess what the original vowel signs should have been. 1 example of this is the word, Gomer, which was used in the text of Genesis, Hosea, and Ezekiel betwixt 1200 and 600 B.C., well over a millennium before post-New-Testament-era scholars added vowel marks. Scholars at present know that the letter-sound "O" was not in use in Semitic languages in ancient times. Linguist C. B. F. Walker says that the ancient Semitic languages used the four vowel sounds a, e, i, and u ( Reading the Past , p. 26). Dr. Isaac Mozeson adds, "The Bible has no vowel marks in the original, handwritten parchment form...Vowels are certainly interchangeable, and ought to be largely ignored when comparison words from dissimilar languages." [9] We will therefore remove the vowels in comparing the names of the post-obit four mysterious peoples in ancient times. It is true that some Semitic languages, such as Hebrew, originally contained no written vowels at all, but only consonants, with the vowels supplied by the reader. The drawback to this is obvious: Different speakers might apply different vowels, creating a slightly unlike pronunciation of the same words. Equally an example, the name of God in Hebrew consisted of the four consonantal characters, YHVH, and is therefore called the Tetragrammaton, meaning "4 letters." Centuries later on, a scholarly statement is raging concerning whether the name of God was originally pronounced Yahweh, Yahvee, Yahvah, or something similar. The solution is hard to come by because of the absence of vowels in ancient written Hebrew.
Two. Four Tribal Names
These two principles, concerning consonants and vowels in ancient languages, will assistance the states in identifying several ancient tribal names which are prominent in the Bible and ancient history. These are the: � KHUMRI These names at first detect announced to be entirely different peoples -- or are they? Modern scholars at present admit that at least iii of them are only different forms of the same tribal proper name. To see that this is the instance, let us first examine the to a higher place names using our linguistic communication principle concerning consonants. Since the guttural consonants KH, G, and C are all interchangeable, nosotros can rewrite these names as follows: (Note that in the third proper noun, nosotros tin can drop the "ANS" which is simply a Greek suffix indicating proper names. This gives us: � GUMRI This helps to make the motion picture clearer, but nosotros need to also realize that vowel shifts, or changes in the vowels used in a proper noun, were frequent occurrences. In add-on, some aboriginal languages did not include vowels in their writing at all. Therefore, the identity of these iv tin can be almost hands seen if nosotros write them using the consonants but: � GMR Repetition of consonants, every bit seen in the second and third names above, was as well a common occurrence. Therefore, past the grammatical rules governing language, all iv tribes must be 1 and the aforementioned people. Who were they? Permit's examine them one at a time.
� GIMIRRAI
� CIMMERIANS
� GOMER
� GIMIRRAI
� GIMMERI (ANS)
� GOMER
� GMRR
� GMMR
� GMR
III. Many Names, I People
The "Khumri" or "Gomri"
When the conquering armies of the nation of Assyria came confronting the ten-tribe kingdom of the house of Israel late in the eighth century, B.C., they did not refer to God's People as "Israel" or "Jews." Instead, the Assyrian word for them was, "Khumri." This has been established through the deciphering of Assyrian "cuneiform" clay tablets. Ancient historian, Alan Ralph Millard, in his recent book, Treasures from Bible Times , says,
"In 1846 men working for Henry Layard on the site of the ancient Assyrian city of Calah (Nimrud) uncovered a cake of polished black stone, carved and inscribed. The 'Blackness Obelisk' records the triumphs of the Assyrian king, Shalmaneser...The beginning console in the second line of pictures proved exciting. The text above the kneeling effigy lists tribute brought to the king from 'Yaua son of [Khumri]' that is, Jehu, who took the throne from a descendant of Omri, king of Israel." [11]
Millard reproduces the Assyrian words mentioning Israel, along with a literal translation. Famed 19th century archeologist, Sir Henry Layard, rediscovered the ancient Assyrian cities, and remarked,
"An identification continued with this word KHUMRI or Omri is one of the most interesting instances of corroborative evidence that can be adduced of the accuracy of the interpretations of the cuneiform character...Sargon is called on the monuments of Khorsabad, 'the conqueror of Samaria and of the circuit of Beth KHUMRI'...Samaria having been built by Omri, naught is more probable than that -- in accordance with a common Eastern custom -- it should have been called, after its founder, Beth KHUMRI, or the house of Omri." [12]
Samaria was the capital of the Ten-Tribe Israel nation. The Assyrians named the Israelites after their King Omri, which they pronounced "Khumri" or "Gomri." This is not surprising, because the Israelites, besides, often gutturalized the pronunciation of the Hebrew "O" by prefixing to it the audio of a "G" or a "Kh." Hebrew scholar Mozeson gives, equally examples, "The correct guttural pronunciation of 'olum' (world, eternity) is really 'kholum'," [xiii] and the city-name, "Amora," is pronounced in Hebrew, "Gomorrah." [14] So the beginning mysterious tribe of our aboriginal listing, the Khumri or Gomri, are definitely identified by ancient inscriptions equally Israelites of the so-chosen, "lost x tribes," who disappeared from history in the Caspian Bounding main region of Medo-Persia during the late 8th century and early 7th century, B.C. The "Gimirrai, Gomer, Cimbri, Celts, Teutons" The Encyclopedia Britannica says,
"Certain it is that in the centre of the 7th century, B.C., Asia Pocket-sized was ravaged by northern nomads (Herodotus iv. 12), ane body of whom is called in Assyrian sources Gimirrai and is represented as coming through the Caucasus. They were probably Iranian speakers, to judge past the few proper names preserved. The proper noun has also been identified with the biblical Gomer, son of Japheth (Gen. 10. ii,three). Later on writers identified them with the Cimbri of Jutland, who were probably Teutonized Celts..." [xv]
It is fascinating that the Gimirrai suddenly appeared out of seeming nowhere in the aforementioned century equally the lost tribes of Israel disappeared, yet no scholar ventures to investigate a link betwixt them. The additional mention of "Iranian" (i.e., Medo-Persian) words in the Gimirrai vocabulary indicates some physical contact between the Gimirrai and Medo-Persians, such equally the captive Israelites might have been expected to accept had. Historian Sharon Turner, in fact, stated that he identified 262 Medo-Persian loan-words in the Anglo-Saxon-Cimmerian vocabulary. [xvi] Who were these mysterious people? According to scholars, the Gimirrai, Gomer, Cimbri, Teutons, and Celts are all linked together as the same people. By applying the rules of language, nosotros realize that the "Gimirrai" were also the same people as the "Khumri," who have been positively identified as Israelites of the lost ten tribes. It is therefore no coincidence that the lost tribes of Israel disappeared in Medo-Persia-Islamic republic of iran (Ii Kings 17:vi), the birthplace of the Gimirrai. The same Encyclopedia Britannica article has this to say most the people known today as Cimmerians:
"An ancient people of the far n or west of Europe, kickoff spoken of by Homer (Odyssey, xi. 12-19), who describes them as living in perpetual darkness. Herodotus (iv. 11-thirteen), in his account of Scythia, regards them every bit the early inhabitants of South Russia (afterwards whom the Bosporus Cimmerius and other places were named.)" [17]
The same encyclopedia reference also traces the European "Cymry" and "Celts" to this same people. There seems to be no question in historian'southward minds, that whoever these Cimmerians were, they were the ancestors of a significant branch of the modern people of Europe. (See box below) Again, by applying the two bones linguistic rules mentioned previously, it may be seen that the Cimmerians were none other than the Khumri or Gomri, the lost ten tribes. Bible "Gomer" Migrated to Europe
"Gomer...a people known in Assyrian inscriptions as Gamir or Gimirrai. They are the Cimmerians of ancient Greek literature...According to the Greek writer Homer, the Cimmerians...appeared in the northern provinces of the Assyrian Empire at the time of Sargon Two, during the eighth century, B.C....Poets of the fourth dimension spoke of the "Cimmerian Bosporos," and the Armenians still call part of their land Gamir. It is thought that the Crimea bears their proper name to the nowadays day" ( Adventist Bible Commentary , vol. 1, p. 269).
"...In Yoma 10a and Yer. Meg.i.9...stands either for "Cimmerii" or for "Germany" ( The Jewish Encyclopedia , vi:40).
"Gomer:...Virtually of the interpreters take him to be the ancestor of the Celtae, and more especially of the Cimmerii" ( Pop & Critical Bible Encyclopedia , ii:726).
"Gomer...became identified with the German Cimbri and the Celtic Cymry." "The old sound of their name is however retained in the oral fissure of the inhabitants of Wales, who call themselves Cumri or Cymry, and their country Cymru" (Franz Delitzsch, quoted in Commentary on the Holy Scriptures , by John Peter Lange, xiii:362).
"The Cimbri, besides every bit the Cumry or Cymry in Wales, and in Bretagne [United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland], are to be regarded every bit in relation with the Cimmerians" ( Commentary on the Holy Scriptures , by John Peter Lange, i:348).
IV. Who Was Gomer?
The eminent Christian historian and archaeologist, Dr. Henry Sayce, stated, "Gomer is the Gimirra of the Assyrian inscriptions, the Kimmerians of the Greek writers." [18] Many reference works associate the names Gimirrai and Cimmerians with Gomer, connecting all three together (meet references higher up) using the very same established linguistic rules we have presented. In fact, because the aboriginal Hebrew linguistic communication did not contain vowels, the nowadays rendering of "Gomer" is a later construction. Since it is now known that the original Assyrian word for State of israel was pronounced "Khumri," and the Babylonian was "Gamir" or "Gimirrai," it is probable that the original vowel-less Hebrew word was pronounced like to these bodily forms, as well. This information is known through the reading of ancient source documents which give u.s. an accurate view of the 7th century, B.C. world that was not possible until contempo years. The kickoff scholarly reference to a higher place tells u.s.a. that the Gimirrai all of a sudden appeared in history during the reign of Sargon II, 722-705 B.C. He was the Assyrian king who conquered Samaria and deported the Israelites to the Assyrian-controlled province of Medo-Persia. It is amazing that historians never notice the tremendous "coincidence" of this: The showtime historical detect of the existence of the Gimirrai was during the same 17 years that the Israelite-Gomri-Khumri were deported and lost to history in that aforementioned province! Gomer in Genesis But the connexion of "Gomer" or "Gimirrai" with ancient State of israel has been clouded by confusion over reference to them in the tenth chapter of Genesis, the so-called "register of nations." In Genesis 10:two-iii, we read, "The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah." A literal, racial interpretation of these verses would make Gomer (or Gimir) a son of Japheth, and not of Shem as the Israelites were. But there are at least two important reasons why this is not and so. First, Japheth lived at the time of the Noahic flood, which has been dated past Christian scholars to near 3400 B.C., more than two,500 years before King Omri, who reigned about 882 to 871 B.C. As shown previously, the Israelites were called "Khumri" or "Gimirri" after Rex Omri; conspicuously, the "Gomer" in Genesis chapter ten is ages before his time! Secondly, the tenth chapter of Genesis is a geographic representation of nations, rather than racial, and is emblematic rather than literal. Nosotros believe in taking the Bible literally whenever possible, interpreting allegorically only when a literal explanation cannot employ, such as the instance here. It has been shown by scholars that the national relationships found in Genesis X do not fit a literal, racial interpretation. For case, Dr. Sayce says,
"The tenth chapter of Genesis is ethnographical rather than ethnological. It does not profess to give an account of the different races of the globe and to separate them one from another according to their various characteristics. It is descriptive just, and such races of men as fell inside the horizon of the writer are described from the point of view of the geographer and not of the ethnologist. The Greeks and Medes, for case, are grouped along with the Tibarenian and Moschian tribes considering they all alike lived in the northward; the Egyptian and the Canaanite are similarly classed together, while the Semitic Assyrian and the not-Semitic Elamite are both the children of Shem. We shall never understand the chapter rightly unless we carry in heed that its main purpose is geographical. In Hebrew, as in other Semitic languages, the relation between a mother-land to its colony, or of a town or country to its inhabitants, was expressed in a genealogical course. The inhabitants of Jerusalem were regarded every bit 'the girl of Jerusalem,' the people of the east were 'the children' of the district to which they belonged." [19]
Dr. Sayce points out that this is the reason the South Arabian tribe of Sheba is listed twice in Genesis Ten, once under the designation of Ham in verse 7, and again listed nether Shem in poesy twenty-eight. The tribe of Sheba originated in the southward, later spreading a colony far to the northward to disharmonism with Assyria in the days of Tiglath-Pilesar and Shalmanesar. [20] Sayce further remarks,
"When, therefore, we are told that 'Canaan begat Zidon his first-born, and Heth,' all that is meant is that the urban center of Sidon, and the Hittites to whom reference is made, were akin to be found in the country chosen Canaan. It does non follow that there was any ethnological kinship between the Phoenician builders of Sidon and the prognathous [i.east., 'protruding-jaw'] Hittites from the north. Indeed, we know from modernistic enquiry that at that place was none." [21]
Sayce, in fact, reproduces Egyptian drawings of both Phoenicians and Hittites, showing graphically that there was a dramatic divergence in racial features (and therefore origins) between these ii peoples. Similarly, Assyria, Elam, and Babylonia (Arphaxad) were called brethren, "not because the natives of them claimed descent from a common father, but considering they occupied the same quarter of the world." [22] Ancient races portrayed on Egyptian monuments are shown in the printed version of this tract, reproduced from Sayce's volume. Included are a rex of the Hittites (with pigtail), Hittite soldiers, an Israelite, and a chief of Ganata or Gath, showing Phoenician-Canaanite features. [23] Prophetic Names for State of israel GOMER: Assyrian, Khumri or Gomri; Babylonian, Gimirrai or Gamir, Greek, Cimmerian; English/Welsh, Cymry, Cimbri, Cumbri, or Celt JEZREEL: "Scattered" into Assyrian dispersion 762-676 B.C. LO-RUHAMAH: "Non pitied" by God because their sins received a only recompense. LO-AMMI: "Not God's People," because they were divorced by Him and sent away to a far land.. Scholars have traced their migration through the Caucasus Mountain region and into Europe in the early pre-Christian centuries. SONS OF THE LIVING GOD: "Christians" -- Israel's ultimate restoration would later come up when they accustomed the Messiah as Savior, becoming his bride at the marriage supper of the lamb. Gomer in Hosea The proper name, Gomer, appears again in an interesting passage in Hosea i:iii. The Encyclopedia Britannica comments on that prophetic book by saying:
"The nearly interesting and important trouble of the book relates to the spousal relationship of Hosea, which is closely related to the form and content of his message. According to the first chapter, Hosea is allowable to have a harlot for his married woman and children of harlotry; he therefore marries Gomer bathroom Diblaim, who subsequently has three children, to whom the prophet gives symbolic names that he may brand them the texts of prophetic messages concerning Israel." [24]
In prophetic symbolism, the prophet Hosea marries an Israelite harlot named "Gomer," (probably originally pronounced "Gomri" or "Gimir") symbolizing the X Tribes of Israel, who true to the prophecy became known as Gimirrai or Cimmerians. In God's eyes, Israel indeed was a harlot adulterating herself with faux worship, and the fact she is purposely called "Gomer" shows that people to be ethnic Israelites. The symbolism continues with their children'southward names: Jezreel, (meaning "scattered"), Lo-Ruhamah ("non pitied"), and Lo-Ammi ("not my people"). As these prophetic names evidence, Israel was punished past existence conquered, scattered in the Assyrian dispersion, and divorced by God. Hosea's words therefore make no logical prophetic sense unless "Gomer" and her offspring were lost and dispersed Israel and their descendants. Hosea 1:x is appropriate here: "In the place where it was said unto them, 'You are non my people,' (i.e., no longer recognized as Israel and possibly blind to their true identity), there shall they be called, 'sons of the living God.' (i.e., "Christ-sons" or Christians, an indication that a spiritual transformation in them would later occur). History recorded the fulfillment of that prophecy when the "Celtic-Cimmerian" peoples migrated into Europe, accustomed Christianity, and became known as Christendom, or "Christ'south Kingdom." "Hosea'due south words brand no logical prophetic sense unless Gomer and her offspring were lost and dispersed Israel." Gomer in Ezekiel 1 last of import reference to Gomer needs to be mentioned, which appears in Ezekiel chapter 38. Gomer is listed as joining a confederacy led by "Gog, main prince of Meschech and Tubal." Gomer apparently does not lead this confederacy, nor are the other listed confederate nations Israelites. In addition, 1 should not assume that all of the lost tribes, Gomer/Gamir, are allied with Gog, but only i portion. So it is primarily a non-State of israel invading strength, which besides includes some number of Israelites. Therefore, dispensationalists who identify Gomer as Europe may be at least partially right in that identification, considering the Celtic-Cymry race did spread throughout Europe, before colonizing North America, Australia, S Africa, and other lands. Only considering Gog's regular army invades the "mountains of Israel," they assume that Gomer itself must not be Israelite. That assumption has fiddling basis. Israelites have warred among themselves since the kingdom was divided into State of israel and Judah after the time of Solomon, about 975 B.C. Whether the battle typified in Ezekiel is literal or allegory is impossible to predict beforehand, but that it represents to some caste withal some other fratricidal war betwixt Israelites seems obvious. One possible fulfillment was addressed in the old nineteenth-century prophecy, George Washington's Vision , a prophetic vision received by America'southward showtime President during the Revolutionary War. It speaks of a confederacy comprised of "Europe, Asia, and Africa" coming in boxing confronting America: "And then my eyes beheld a fearful scene: From each of these countries arose thick, blackness clouds that were soon joined into one." The late Professor C. A. L. Totten of Yale University wrote in the year 1898: "The third and final peril clearly indicates a futurity invasion of our country by the Old World. The drift of events and Bible prophecy betoken that a great combination of powers volition exist the actor." [25] In the prophecy, help against this peril comes in the form of divine assistance, apparently the Second Appearance.
Five. Summary: Ii Certainties
The Encyclopedia Britannica article we quoted states that it is "sure" that the tribe of Gomer is identified with the Celts, Teutons, and related peoples of Europe. Nosotros have establish through linguistics (the study of languages), too every bit through Bible prophecy in Hosea, that the people called Gomer or Gimir are in fact Israelites. Linguistically, Israel's proper name, Khumri, is the phonetic equivalent of the European, Cymri; and Gomri/Khumri is also the consonantal equivalent to Gomer, Gimir, and Cimmiri. Therefore, if it is indeed a certainty that Gomer is constitute in the Europeans of today, so it is an equal certainty that those same Europeans are Israelites.
We accept quoted sources that observe these Cymry-Celtic people in England, Wales, and Frg. The Encyclopedia Britannica further traces them to Scandinavia, Scotland, France, Belgium, Switzerland, Espana, Italy, and Russia; in fact, they spread themselves throughout the continent of Europe. The Britannica also reveals that the New Testament Epistle to the Galatians was written to them, [26] in which the Apostle Paul refers to them equally "the sons of Abraham" (Galatians 3:7). It is odd that scholars so hands admit to certainty concerning the relationship between the names Gomer, Gimirrai, and Cimmeri, nonetheless are silent apropos the name Khumri. It is never mentioned or investigated. Author and historian Geoffrey Ashe, mentioned before, states that information technology is "altogether also complicated" and "a theme for speculation merely." That statement is rather specious, since information technology never appears "besides complicated" for them to positively link the other three names Gomer, Gimirrai, and Cimmeri, using the same rules! Mr. Ashe also speaks of "alleged linguistic coincidences" which support the Anglo-Israel view. Only there is aught either alleged or coincidental nearly it. The data we have presented is based upon standard, accustomed grammatical rules, and the known fact that Israel was the Khumri of the ancient inscriptions. Since the proper noun Gomri/Khumri is the consonantal equivalent of Gomer, Gimir, and Cymri, information technology would indeed exist a strange "coincidence" if they were not identical peoples! Scholars don't consider the identity of the latter iii as coincidence, but as fact!
What does this hateful to you and I who trace our roots to this aforementioned Biblical people? It is a tremendous heritage and responsibleness that we realize. Israel was to be God's servant nation, and a light to the earth. State of israel, too, would receive many promises, including Jacob's blessing as outlined in Genesis chapter 49. The knowledge of your identity should inspire and invigorate you with evangelical fervor, to make a positive difference in your world and to serve God more faithfully each twenty-four hour period. The Anglo-Israel identity is at present a proven fact! What yous do with this knowledge is upwards to yous. See to it that you lot make your calling and election certain! (2 Peter 1:x). FOOTNOTES: [1] Geoffrey Ashe, article: "Lost Tribes Of State of israel," in The Encyclopedia of Myth and Magic , pp. 1645-1646.
[2] Dr. O'Brien, quoted in Betham, Etruria-Celtica , 1842, vol. i, p. 59
[3] McClintock & Stiff's Encyclopedia , vol. 2, p. 603
[four] Dr. Isaac Elchanan Mozeson, The Discussion , 1989, p. 39
[5] ibid. , p. 49
[6] Sir William Betham, Etruria-Celtica , 1842, vol. 1, p. 58
[vii] ibid. , p. 14
[viii] Dr. Richard Cumberland, Origines Gentium Antiquissimae ; or, Attempts For Discovering the Times Of the Outset Planting of Nations , London, 1724, p. 331
[9] Dr. Cyrus H. Gordon, The Mutual Background Of Greek And Hebrew Civilizations , West.Due west. Norton & Co., 1965, p. 138
[10] Mozeson, p. x
[11] Alan Ralph Millard, Treasures From Bible Times , 1985, p. 31
[12] Sir Austen Henry Layard, Discoveries Among The Ruins Of Assyria And Babylon , Yard.P. Putnam & Sons, 1853, chapter 26, pp. 492-494 abridged edition; pp. 612-614 unabridged edition
[13] Mozeson, p. 48
[14] ibid. , p. 80
[15] Encyclopedia Britannica , 1957, vol. five, p. 707-8
[sixteen] Sharon Turner, History of the Anglo-Saxons , 1836, p. 100
[17] Encyclopedia Britannica , ibid., p. 707
[eighteen] Dr. A. H. Sayce, Races of the Onetime Attestation , 1925, p. 71
[19] ibid. , p. 65-66
[20] ibid. , p. 67
[21] ibid. , p. 66
[22] ibid. , p. 66-67
[23] ibid. , frontispiece
[24] Encyclopedia Britannica , 1957, vol. xi, p.783
[25] National Forecast Magazine , vol. xix, Oct., 1959
[26] Encyclopedia Britannica , 1910, vol. v, p. 611-614
Hope of State of israel Ministries -- Preparing the Way for the Return of YEHOVAH God and His Messiah!
| Hope of Israel Ministries |  | Scan with your Smartphone for more than information |
Source: https://www.hope-of-israel.org/israeliteowhiterace.html
0 Response to "Yaua Son of Omri Yet Again"
ارسال یک نظر